I liked ozones trasparency and sound better. T racks standone a few times at my cousins place, found it very meh. That should be interesting because CD Architect and Sound Forge 4.5 were my entry into this line of software many years ago. DVD Architect came with Vegas 13 but I haven't tried it yet. If I'm mastering a casual project I do use Vegas because it can burn a disc suitable for local duplication. I don't know if that meets the requirements for your mixdown method or if having two machines is part of the deal. You know, you can have two iterations of Vegas running on one machine, each using different interfaces and running at different sample rates. I think that's correct, if I'm understanding you. This could be a useful mixdown/ mastering thing I would love to see Sequoia have. Nothing else I've used is as fast, though Reaper is okay.Īudiokid, post: 439390, member: 1 wrote: (edit) Like the ability to run at 2 different sample rates on the same DAW, at the same time, comes to mind? Do I have this correct? I don't know the community, I just know me. What is the overall expectations, hopefulness, pros/cons you and the Vegas community has now? Do you think Magix will incorporate some of the cool things Vegas has? You use Vegas right? Which was bought by Magix. Audiokid, post: 439390, member: 1 wrote: Boulder, I've been meaning to ask.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |